<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Inside eProductivity | Comments</title><description>inside eproductivity.com</description><link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:43:42 AM -0700</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>re: 2 Tips for Organizing Digital  Reference  Items</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:43:42 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>2 Tips for Organizing Digital &quot;Reference&quot; Items</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@David<br /><br />That's a great tip. It's seems especially relevant for paper files because they take up a lot more physical space and don't have full-text index searching to help you locate the information you're seeking.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@David<br /><br />That's a great tip. It's seems especially relevant for paper files because they take up a lot more physical space and don't have full-text index searching to help you locate the information you're seeking.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/2-tips-for-organizing-digital-reference-items?opendocument&amp;comments#07292010114342AMRHEPYF.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>2 Tips for Organizing Digital  Reference  Items</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:42:53 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>David Littlehales</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>2 Tips for Organizing Digital &quot;Reference&quot; Items</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Then for pruning my system, I review my filed items A-Z once per year on a schedule like this: <br /><br />12 months of the year, each month getting two letters. So January gets A and B files, February C & D files and so on with December getting the final extra months of the alphabet. This applies to files, phone lists, whatever.<br /><br />This has helped me considerably for just have junk become more junk.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then for pruning my system, I review my filed items A-Z once per year on a schedule like this: <br /><br />12 months of the year, each month getting two letters. So January gets A and B files, February C & D files and so on with December getting the final extra months of the alphabet. This applies to files, phone lists, whatever.<br /><br />This has helped me considerably for just have junk become more junk.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/2-tips-for-organizing-digital-reference-items?opendocument&amp;comments#07292010064253AMICAJ4C.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:28:40 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Cherisa</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Be careful about using public spaces for a regular telecommuting location. Shoulder surfing possibilities can lead to breaches of business confidentiality.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Be careful about using public spaces for a regular telecommuting location. Shoulder surfing possibilities can lead to breaches of business confidentiality.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#06142010092840AMICAMBY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:43:43 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Paul Scheuer</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I just started using the categorized view after using only the standard eP view for about 14 months. In about 30 sec I was reminded of what I missed most in the IBM template:<br /><br />1. Ability to "see" my new meeting invites from my inbox (don't have to switch views), threfore no risk of missing meetings.<br /><br />2. A more "in your face" reminder of urgent emails (not that looking for the red ! is difficult)<br /><br />I agree with "feeling" of many other IBMers that staying in this view sorted oldest to youngest (top to bottom) feels like a detractor, but I think it's just because of being accustomed to the IBM template. Think about this:<br /><br />Should we process non-urgent mails youngest to oldest? In the context of GTD, it is incorrect - you may find that the oldest email really is a "hidden" task that had you made it a task before processing everythng else, by virtue of its due date becomes your highest priority.<br /><br />How I process now (with what I call the IBM view + IBM backward sort):<br /><br />1. Act on meeting notices from the inbox - save many clicks<br /><br />2. Act on oldest urgent emails<br /><br />3. drop to the bottom on the normal priority emails and "slide-up" the preview pane to view the oldest, non-urgent email. take 1 of 4 acions:<br /><br />a. Delete (I have a button on my mouse programmed to do this)<br /><br />b.drag right (associate to an existing project or action)<br /><br />c.drag left (convert it to a new project or action)<br /><br />d.reply (if I think I can beat the 2min rule) & process the reply as either a "drag left" or "drag right" item<br /><br />The template will them advance to the next oldest email automatically.<br /><br />so, don't get hung-up of the direction that you're using in "plowing through" your emails. Once I made these steps a habbit, I was less anxious about not getting to aging emails.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just started using the categorized view after using only the standard eP view for about 14 months. In about 30 sec I was reminded of what I missed most in the IBM template:<br /><br />1. Ability to "see" my new meeting invites from my inbox (don't have to switch views), threfore no risk of missing meetings.<br /><br />2. A more "in your face" reminder of urgent emails (not that looking for the red ! is difficult)<br /><br />I agree with "feeling" of many other IBMers that staying in this view sorted oldest to youngest (top to bottom) feels like a detractor, but I think it's just because of being accustomed to the IBM template. Think about this:<br /><br />Should we process non-urgent mails youngest to oldest? In the context of GTD, it is incorrect - you may find that the oldest email really is a "hidden" task that had you made it a task before processing everythng else, by virtue of its due date becomes your highest priority.<br /><br />How I process now (with what I call the IBM view + IBM backward sort):<br /><br />1. Act on meeting notices from the inbox - save many clicks<br /><br />2. Act on oldest urgent emails<br /><br />3. drop to the bottom on the normal priority emails and "slide-up" the preview pane to view the oldest, non-urgent email. take 1 of 4 acions:<br /><br />a. Delete (I have a button on my mouse programmed to do this)<br /><br />b.drag right (associate to an existing project or action)<br /><br />c.drag left (convert it to a new project or action)<br /><br />d.reply (if I think I can beat the 2min rule) & process the reply as either a "drag left" or "drag right" item<br /><br />The template will them advance to the next oldest email automatically.<br /><br />so, don't get hung-up of the direction that you're using in "plowing through" your emails. Once I made these steps a habbit, I was less anxious about not getting to aging emails.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#06042010084343AMICALFV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 11:08:12 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@Brian<br /><br />Great story about your colleague and his garden shed office. I identify with the psychological need for a "commute" when working from home. It's another benefit when I go to my local coffee shop to do my work.<br /><br />@Roy<br /><br />I haven't tried using the TV to create background noise, but it's an interesting idea.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Brian<br /><br />Great story about your colleague and his garden shed office. I identify with the psychological need for a "commute" when working from home. It's another benefit when I go to my local coffee shop to do my work.<br /><br />@Roy<br /><br />I haven't tried using the TV to create background noise, but it's an interesting idea.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#05222010110812PMICA987.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 07:31:39 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roy Rumaner</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I have been working from home for the last 3 years. I find that if I turn the TV (channel doesn't really matter) on downstairs (my office is on the second floor at the opposite end of the house) I can hear the noise and feel as if there is something else going on in the house. <br /><br />I also make sure I take frequent breaks to walk around the house or go outside for a few minutes. This makes it feel as if I am going to a meeting or walking to another office to meet with a coworker (even it it is only to pet the dog next door). Of course I take the cordless phone with me just in case a client decides to call me at that moment.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have been working from home for the last 3 years. I find that if I turn the TV (channel doesn't really matter) on downstairs (my office is on the second floor at the opposite end of the house) I can hear the noise and feel as if there is something else going on in the house. <br /><br />I also make sure I take frequent breaks to walk around the house or go outside for a few minutes. This makes it feel as if I am going to a meeting or walking to another office to meet with a coworker (even it it is only to pet the dog next door). Of course I take the cordless phone with me just in case a client decides to call me at that moment.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#05222010073139AMICAK2U.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:17:32 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian O'Donovan</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Ryan,<br /><br />This is a great post and is spot on about working from home, which is not as perfect as it seems to people who have never tried it.<br /><br />I like listening to music even when working from the office. I pick the music to match the mood I want to induce. There is no such thing as complete silence. If I don't have music playing I find that I can't help my mind from concentrating too much on whatever background noise there is.<br /><br />When you work from an office outside your home it is easy to define the time spend on work as the time spent in the office, but if you are working from home it is not too easy. A colleague of mine who worked exclusively from his home office set up his home office in the garden shed because he found that psychologically he preferred to have a commute to the office even if the commute was only a few meters long.<br /><br />Brian]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ryan,<br /><br />This is a great post and is spot on about working from home, which is not as perfect as it seems to people who have never tried it.<br /><br />I like listening to music even when working from the office. I pick the music to match the mood I want to induce. There is no such thing as complete silence. If I don't have music playing I find that I can't help my mind from concentrating too much on whatever background noise there is.<br /><br />When you work from an office outside your home it is easy to define the time spend on work as the time spent in the office, but if you are working from home it is not too easy. A colleague of mine who worked exclusively from his home office set up his home office in the garden shed because he found that psychologically he preferred to have a commute to the office even if the commute was only a few meters long.<br /><br />Brian]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#05222010041732AMICAF9H.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 02:03:53 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@Tom,<br /><br />If you're running the eProductivity 2.x beta, we provide the Categorized view as an option. Alternatively, if your company has customized your regular Notes mail template to unhide the Categorized view, then it would be available to you. <br /><br />These are the two primary ways to get the Categorized feature.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Tom,<br /><br />If you're running the eProductivity 2.x beta, we provide the Categorized view as an option. Alternatively, if your company has customized your regular Notes mail template to unhide the Categorized view, then it would be available to you. <br /><br />These are the two primary ways to get the Categorized feature.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05212010020353AMICACMY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:20:26 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It's not clear to me how a Notes user can choose the categorized view. Can someone help?<br /><br />Thanks.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not clear to me how a Notes user can choose the categorized view. Can someone help?<br /><br />Thanks.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05202010102026PMICA8AB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:42:48 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Chris! A computer-treadmill combo is on my wish list. I'm looking for ways I can be more active while still using my computer. I just purchased some small dumbbells the other day as a start. I plan on using them while I'm on calls, so if you give me a ring, I'm likely to be lifting. ;-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks, Chris! A computer-treadmill combo is on my wish list. I'm looking for ways I can be more active while still using my computer. I just purchased some small dumbbells the other day as a start. I plan on using them while I'm on calls, so if you give me a ring, I'm likely to be lifting. ;-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#05202010124248PMICAR5B.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 09:53:22 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chris Blatnick</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>3 Things I&#8217;ve Learned about Being Productive when Telecommuting</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Excellent post, Ryan! I agree that all of those elements are essential. Having some music on is a great motivator for me. I also recently purchased a shelf for the treadmill that allows me to walk at a slow speed and still actively work on my computer. It has been a great addition, as I find moving keeps me more alert than sitting in a chair staring at a glowing rectangle all day! :-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Excellent post, Ryan! I agree that all of those elements are essential. Having some music on is a great motivator for me. I also recently purchased a shelf for the treadmill that allows me to walk at a slow speed and still actively work on my computer. It has been a great addition, as I find moving keeps me more alert than sitting in a chair staring at a glowing rectangle all day! :-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/3-things-ive-learned-about-being-productive-when-telecommuting?opendocument&amp;comments#05202010095322AMICAMTE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 07:27:01 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pierre-Alain Luder</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I set up my mail not to have meeting notices coming in the inbox, using the miniview instead.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I set up my mail not to have meeting notices coming in the inbox, using the miniview instead.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#20052010072701ICAJXX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 May 2010 06:51:53 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Robinson</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@Eric, that's interesting, when I use the IBM version, I see my notes in date descending order, but when I use the eProductivity view I see them in date ascending which I very much prefer. Perhaps I have some config that is causing the IBM inbox to show the opposite.<br /><br />I agree, in general, that the categorisation should not be required, but I work with some worldwide teams and can start work with a full inbox when it had been empty the night before. Categorisation to split the calendar notes and regular emails (not by importance for me) is useful in this case so I can quickly check whether any meeting requests are for today.<br /><br />pjr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Eric, that's interesting, when I use the IBM version, I see my notes in date descending order, but when I use the eProductivity view I see them in date ascending which I very much prefer. Perhaps I have some config that is causing the IBM inbox to show the opposite.<br /><br />I agree, in general, that the categorisation should not be required, but I work with some worldwide teams and can start work with a full inbox when it had been empty the night before. Categorisation to split the calendar notes and regular emails (not by importance for me) is useful in this case so I can quickly check whether any meeting requests are for today.<br /><br />pjr]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05092010065153PMICA47Y.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The GTD &amp; Lotus Notes webinar is tomorrow!</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 May 2010 12:06:37 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The GTD &amp; Lotus Notes webinar is tomorrow!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Yes, there will be replay available in the (hopefully!) near future. I'll be posting news about it here on the Inside blog.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, there will be replay available in the (hopefully!) near future. I'll be posting news about it here on the Inside blog.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/the-gtd-lotus-notes-webinar-is-tomorrow?opendocument&amp;comments#05082010120637AMICAACP.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Create &#8217;Waiting For&#8217; items with fewer clicks </title>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 11:41:36 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan Heathers</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Create &#8217;Waiting For&#8217; items with fewer clicks </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for suggesting them!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks for suggesting them!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/create-waiting-for-items-with-fewer-clicks?opendocument&amp;comments#05072010114136PMICA9V4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Create &#8217;Waiting For&#8217; items with fewer clicks </title>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 05:45:58 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephan H. Wissel</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Create &#8217;Waiting For&#8217; items with fewer clicks </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Glad to see my feature suggestions become reality.<br /><br />:-) stw]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Glad to see my feature suggestions become reality.<br /><br />:-) stw]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/create-waiting-for-items-with-fewer-clicks?opendocument&amp;comments#05072010054558PMICA2WS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 04:40:10 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kevin Brady</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I would like to see the categorization as defined in the Notes 8.x template. Allow the user to select which categories to display and if possible in what order. View should default to newest on top, but allow sort by date.<br /><br />Sorting by (name and date), or date, or (subject and date) - sort by subject should strip out 'RE','FWD', etc.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would like to see the categorization as defined in the Notes 8.x template. Allow the user to select which categories to display and if possible in what order. View should default to newest on top, but allow sort by date.<br /><br />Sorting by (name and date), or date, or (subject and date) - sort by subject should strip out 'RE','FWD', etc.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05072010044010PMICAVRN.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 04:13:48 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andrea Ames</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[After using the categorized Beta for a few days, now, I am still in favor of it. :) At a minimum, I find it much better for me to get my calendar items categorized separately and at the top of the inbox. I am away from my inbox for enough long periods, and get enough inbox volume over short periods, that categorization is a VERY noticeable benefit for me around calendar items. I would vote VERY strongly in favor of keeping this for the final 2.0 release.<br /><br />For the rest, it would be nice to have the option to separate "urgent" items, but not necessary for me (and it would be nice to be able to choose/turn this on/off).<br /><br />As for sort order, I've adapted to both most-recent on top, as well as oldest on top. I could go either way, but that would be another nice preference option.<br /><br />I also do not think it's critical/important for the categorization to extend into my folders -- just inbox is fine.<br /><br />Jeff, re: calendar shadow, it's working fine for me. I'm using LN 8.5.1.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After using the categorized Beta for a few days, now, I am still in favor of it. :) At a minimum, I find it much better for me to get my calendar items categorized separately and at the top of the inbox. I am away from my inbox for enough long periods, and get enough inbox volume over short periods, that categorization is a VERY noticeable benefit for me around calendar items. I would vote VERY strongly in favor of keeping this for the final 2.0 release.<br /><br />For the rest, it would be nice to have the option to separate "urgent" items, but not necessary for me (and it would be nice to be able to choose/turn this on/off).<br /><br />As for sort order, I've adapted to both most-recent on top, as well as oldest on top. I could go either way, but that would be another nice preference option.<br /><br />I also do not think it's critical/important for the categorization to extend into my folders -- just inbox is fine.<br /><br />Jeff, re: calendar shadow, it's working fine for me. I'm using LN 8.5.1.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05062010041348PMICAV97.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 02:19:51 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jeff Land</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I like the categorized inbox. However, I also would prefer the order in the categories to be newest email first, not last.<br /><br />Since I can be on the road for half a day, I can easily accumulate 30-50 emails or more before I can get to my inbox, and in that bunch of emails, there can be many calendar requests - this is the best feature of the categorized inbox.<br /><br />On that point, is the calendar shadow feature working? I don't seem to see it. This is a feature in Notes 8.5 in which any calendar request shows up in your calendar but grayed out, until you accept (or decline). Thank you.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like the categorized inbox. However, I also would prefer the order in the categories to be newest email first, not last.<br /><br />Since I can be on the road for half a day, I can easily accumulate 30-50 emails or more before I can get to my inbox, and in that bunch of emails, there can be many calendar requests - this is the best feature of the categorized inbox.<br /><br />On that point, is the calendar shadow feature working? I don't seem to see it. This is a feature in Notes 8.5 in which any calendar request shows up in your calendar but grayed out, until you accept (or decline). Thank you.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05062010021951PMICASZY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 01:33:01 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Urspringer</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Categorized or Standard Inbox?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It is GREAT to have the categorized inbox back... as an IBMer I was used to that view and it is very nice to have it back again.<br /><br />I agree with Dave: The newest mail has to be first in every category. I changed it by myself in the code and it is now as I would expect it.<br /><br />As there is mixed feedback here maybe you would like to make this an option which the user can change? I really, really would like to have the categorized inbox also in the production release!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is GREAT to have the categorized inbox back... as an IBMer I was used to that view and it is very nice to have it back again.<br /><br />I agree with Dave: The newest mail has to be first in every category. I changed it by myself in the code and it is now as I would expect it.<br /><br />As there is mixed feedback here maybe you would like to make this an option which the user can change? I really, really would like to have the categorized inbox also in the production release!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://inside.eproductivity.com/ica/eproductivityblog.nsf/dx/categorized-or-standard-inbox---which-do-you-prefer?opendocument&amp;comments#05062010013301PMICAS4P.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
